Sunday, November 15, 2015

Picture inside Paris Bataclan Theater of Victims after shooting. Glaring Oddities about it. Video start of shooting inside Bataclan

UPDATE 11/25/15 - I do not know what happened and Why the picture was taken down. I did not do it.  But I have inserted it once again.  This picture is on many websites so there is no reason they can have for taken it down from my blog.  

I have been praying and sending my energy of Love to the French people and to the world since the Paris Attack.  I have also been putting my energy into the complete truth of the horrendous attack to be revealed.

It seems just as in the past there are oddities to the mass shootings/bombings that have happened to the large scale terrorist attacks.  We already know the thousands of 'oddities' from 9/11.

This was France's 9/11. The question about it is, will it turn out to prove as the U.S. 9/11 did, that the government was heavily involved?

I know there are already some strange oddities, just like the Syrian passport that was found on a terrorist in Bataclan theater.  Which is now being shown to be a fake passport, but still used by the terrorist for refugee status in October.

A video has been released showing the seconds before the shooting and just as the shooting started inside the theater.  (liveleak won't embed for some reason)

Before I mention the various things about the image. I want to mention an 'eyewitness' the night of the attacks.  I was watching France 24 online.  They had a woman who had been in the theater, a Jennie Watson from my memory, on the phone twice being interviewed about an hour apart talking about her ordeal inside Bataclan.  She was very calm both times saying, it had not hit her yet about what happened.  But her story changed from the first time she told it to the second time, which I thought was very strange.

During her first phone interview, she said they (her and her husband) were sitting enjoying the concert on the ground level, sitting down when they heard 'firecrackers', they made their way to an exit door calmly along with others.  They opened the door and there were men standing there shooting at anyone who came out.  They closed the door and waited one minute and then all the people there just began to run out the door. She said a woman had been shot in the leg that was next to her.  (That first story does match the video of people coming out the doors in the alley, as there are people laying outside those doors who have appeared to be shot)  *video linked in sentence, as for some reason I can not embed any live leak video in my posts*

Her second interview an hour later, the story was changed, yet it was the same woman.  She was again very calm and telling the story as if talking about what she had had to eat somewhere, without any emotion, etc.  She said they were sitting and watching the concert when they heard 'firecrackers' thinking it was part of the show.  They heard more and then began to make their way out, but they stood at the exit doors for about 10 minutes before deciding something was really going on.  She said a lot of people then made their way out together.

I immediately noticed the difference in the stories, yet it was the same person speaking about an horrible event just a couple of hours earlier.  How could the story have changed that much?  First story, they made their way out immediately, but there were shooters outside as people came out, so they closed the doors and waited about a minute before running out.   The second story, was they waited 10 minutes before even opening the doors and leaving the theater after the shooting started and there was no mention of shooters outside.  Besides the fact of the 10 minutes (which may have just been a misstatement and she had meant 1 minute) wait after the shooting before even leaving.  The only part of her two stories told an hour apart that was even the same was that there was a woman shot in the leg next to her as she was leaving and that she had been sitting down on the ground level watching the concert.   The problem with the fact of her saying she was on the ground level watching the concert from her seat, is there are no seats on the ground level, it is standing room only.

So the Jennie Watson, the eye witness was either someone lying, who called in and just wanted her couple of minutes of fame,  not really at the concert  or someone who for some bizarre reason could not get her story straight.

I wanted mention that 'eyewitness' account as I then began thinking we need to look at everything carefully for inconsistencies to the official story, just as the thousands from the 9/11 official story that is obvious to anyone who has done one moment of research on it.

Warning: This is a disturbing picture after the shooting, as there are people who lost their lives and I feel for the families and am not putting it out for shock value but because there are things I don't understand about it.

Here is the picture

Seeing bodies is disturbing but I thought that there would have been many more.  From what we have been told 112 people lost their lives inside the Bataclan.  From the image above, I count 25 victims.  They could have taken triple that amount out already, but then there would be triple the amount of blood.  I can see where a body had been dragged or something but that would not have been 87 of them.

Another oddity, is looking over at what would be the entrance (left side) of the theater and where the terrorist entered.  Instead of the majority of the victims in the picture located are towards the stage, the logical outcome of a shooting where terrorist begin shooting from the entrance (back), is where the majority of the victims should be.  I only see one body at the door way.  The most people would have been shot at the left of the picture not the right.  They would have been shot from the back.  Let's say they already got a lot of victim's bodies out, the blood is still not there in the picture on the left to match.

Let's recap and summarize the above, because there are more oddities I have noticed.  First, not the amount of victims as stated nor the amount of blood to match the official victim count.  The location of the victims are wrong in the majority compared to where they would naturally be the majority shot.

Other oddities,  I am sure many people here have gone to concerts, as I have.  This was a heavy metal concert too.  Concert venues make a lot of money on concession sales and at a heavy metal one, I bet they would be selling lots of beer etc.  I have confirmed that Bataclan does indeed sell beer and mixed drinks.     From link about drinks at Bataclan:
Ticket prices vary. Beer €4, mixed drinks €7.
Now, look at the picture and the top tier of seats right in front of the camera, besides the floor of the theater.

Notice the oddity?

Where is all the trash?  Where are all the cups and things strewn about when people are leaving in a panic?  There is relatively no trash to speak of there.  1500 people were at that concert, yet no one had beer or drinks?  The lack of trash is a major oddity to me!  Even at small normal concerts the amount of trash left on the ground as people leave is enormous.  Here where people left in a panic to survive from being shot, the amount of trash from people just throwing things on the ground should be huge.  They would not have cleaned up the trash already, before getting the victims out.

Now lets look at the top tier.  Why aren't things strewn about around the top tier, from people leaving items behind as they are panicking to leave to not be murdered?   Why isn't there one piece of trash right in front of the camera (you can see the floor)?  Why isn't there at least one single personal item somewhere on that top level showing people had once been sitting (sold out concert) when a terrorist attack began?  If I was on a top tier when a terrorist attack of shooting began, I would not even worry or think about my  purse or any other item.  I would throw any drink I had in my hand on the ground and find a way out.

One other thing that is strange about the picture.  Why aren't police and other authorities in the picture?  Seems to me, if someone was taking a picture of the scene from the top tier, they would have been doing so while authorities had already gone inside.  Also where are remnants of items from explosions (grenades and the terrorist exploding their suicide vest)?

Some may disagree with my analysis of the picture, but from my observations there is no way the picture matches the amount of victims, from where they are located to the amount of blood in the scene as the official story.  Nor does it match the fact there was 1500 people inside when a terrorist attack began, due to the lack of trash nor any personal item anywhere in the photo, showing people left in a rush.

Again I am not making light of the Paris Terrorist Attack and the people who lost their lives.  I am simply seeing glaringly obvious problems from the official story to what the picture shows.

Update - I was just looking at pictures from the whole evening of the 13th.  The Daily Mail has a large amount of them, including the picture I have here (except the bodies are  blurred out).

There are oddities in those pictures.  Why is it, the victims/survivors of the shootings are always barely dressed?  Even the picture of the woman being helped as she is crying.  The clothing does not match the rest of the people.  I was about to see what the temperature was that evening, but once I saw the soccer stadium picture and people leaving it (in the Daily Mail link) I can see they all have heavy coats on.  If the victims of the Bataclan had their coats off and clothes off while inside the theater, than wouldn't clothes be strewn about in the picture too?

Saturday, November 14, 2015

U.S. declaring War on Syria due to Paris Attack, Says All need to join the Fight and get Assad out at same time. Transcript of Speech now embedded

John Kerry is on TV right now on France24 declaring war on Syria and the terrorist inside.  Saying everyone needs to join the fight inside Syria and get Assad (he calls dictator) out at same time.

He is saying due to the Paris Attack the U.S. now needs to go to war inside Syria and giving it 6 months to get Assad out.

We now know why the Paris Attack happened.  Saying there needs to be a cease fire immediately.
In other words Russia has to stop bombing the terrorist, that is who they are calling for a cease fire.

Saying UN needs to take over Syria right away and monitor all going on.  

Says UN is going to accelerate the cease fire. 

Seems to me he was threatening Russia at the same time.

War is being declared now.  Is this the start of a World War?

This is just a short post to get the information out.

UPDATE:  Here is the transcript of what Kerry said and declaring War.

Added Nov. 15 - I noticed glaring oddities of the picture from inside Bataclan theater of victims after the shooting. WARNING: Graphic Image.

Picture inside Paris Bataclan Theater of Victims after shooting. Glaring Oddities about it. Video start of shooting inside Bataclan

Sunday, October 11, 2015

NBC and Saturday Night Live Wants Constitution Gone and 2nd Amendment/Guns Rights Wiped Out. Implied Gun Owners 'Extremist'

I watched SNL last night, though I don't normally do so because they are so one sided politically.  Their segments always are very liberal.

I was completely outraged at what they said on Weekend Update. But before that, they had a segment about guns and it implied people were over the top and reckless regarding them.  After weekend update they had yet another segment about guns that made those who stand by their rights as complete and total nuts, besides being extremist, using a 9 year old character played by Amy Schumer

Watch the weekend update at 32 seconds they begin their rant that we should not have gun rights and the constitution needs to go.   I was literally shocked!

This is what they said, among other things in the segment:

The two Weekend Update hosts joked about the role of the Constitution as it pertains to the right to own guns. Che joked, “There’s a gun for every man, woman and child in this country; what are we preparing for, a rap beef?”.
He continued, “I know the forefathers said you have a right to own guns, but they also said you had a right to own people… the Constitution is a lot like our grandfather, he’s wise, we love him, and he means well, but he’s getting really, really old.”

For NBC/SNL to have 3 segments against guns and implying anyone who owns a gun is a nut, shows those at the top are desperate for people to give up their rights!

There is a real push now for the U.S. citizens to give up our 2nd amendment rights and our freedoms.  The Pope is even pushing it, by saying those who own guns are not Christians. 

All I can say, for those who believe in our Constitution and our Rights, the more we are pushed, the stronger and firmer we will stand with our determination to keep our Freedoms and Rights that our Forefathers gave us!

Those in power want all of us to give up our right to defend ourselves and our nation.

History has shown over and over again when people of a nation give up their right to guns, the country becomes a country based on fear of the officials through tyranny.  Genocide is the next step and easily accomplished, against the people.

Look at the Middle East, ISIS has declared no guns allowed outside of their members. 

The Commonsense site has an article form 2012 about the history of gun confiscation and what happened afterwards. 

1. In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915-1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves against their ethnic-cleansing government, were arrested and exterminated.
2. In 1929, the former Soviet Union established gun control as a means of controlling the “more difficult” of their citizens. From 1929 to the death of Stalin, 40 million Soviets met an untimely end at the hand of various governmental agencies as they were arrested and exterminated.
3. After the rise of the Nazi’s, Germany established their version of gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, the mentally ill, and others, who were unable to defend themselves against the “Brown Shirts”, were arrested and exterminated. Interestingly, the Brown Shirts were eventually targeted for extermination themselves following their blind acts of allegiance to Hitler. Any American military and police would be wise to grasp the historical significance of the Brown Shirts’ fate.
4. After Communist China established gun control in 1935, an estimated 50 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves against their fascist leaders, were arrested and exterminated.
5. Closer to home, Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayans, unable to defend themselves against their ruthless dictatorship, were arrested and exterminated.
6. Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves from their dictatorial government, were arrested and exterminated.
7. Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million of the “educated” people, unable to defend themselves against their fascist government, were arrested and exterminated.
8. In 1994, Rwanda disarmed the Tutsi people and being unable to defend themselves from their totalitarian government, nearly one million were summarily executed.
The total numbers of victims who lost their lives because of gun control is approximately 70 million people in the 20th century. The historical voices from 70 million corpses speak loudly and clearly to those Americans who are advocating for a de facto gun ban. Governments murdered four times as many civilians as were killed in all the international and domestic wars combined. Governments murdered millions more people than were killed by common criminals and it all followed gun control.

What history shows us is more people are murdered through gun control and confiscation than if the people had been able to bear arms.  Those murdered were 70 Million by their governments!

 If people are paying attention, our government is not exactly "For the People and By the People" anymore.  In fact if you read what Boehner wrote about resigning all you need to do is read between the lines.

"The first job of any Speaker is to protect this institution that we all love. 

He did not say "Country or People" but he said Institution!  That is what it is all about.  Those in power are there to protect the "institution" and themselves.  We simply need to read and listen to what people are saying carefully to understand what they are really saying.

Our government is out of control, in my opinion.  It is not about the people at all, it is about control and power.  Those at the top obviously have a plan and to fully implement that plan they need us to give up our guns.  Their plan may also be 20 years down the line as they think and plot years/decades ahead of time.  All you have to do is look at 9/11 and how long it appears that plan had been in place.

I am sorry to all those who lose their lives through guns, no violence is acceptable!  But please read that more people lose their lives through chemicals, ie: pharmaceutical drugs, than guns.  Is anyone pushing to outlaw prescription drugs?

What is also crazy is the fact that pharmaceutical companies were given immunity from law suits by the people when their drugs cause death.  You can not sue a drug company.  Yet Hillary Clinton was gun manufacturers responsible and sue able for gun deaths.  

Here are the other skits by SNL last night about guns:

The gun part starts at 2:40 seconds in the video

Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.


Sunday, October 4, 2015

Government Chart of Gun Murders - A Complete Lie! Real Statistics from FBI. Real Truth through real charts on gun violence/murders.

I am seeing this chart about how guns have been used in murders of more people than anything else in the world in the U.S., including Terrorism. (7 Terrorism murders???  I will get to that little fact and have something to say about it, later in this article).

This is a chart Motherjones is using on their site:

There is a problem with the chart and mind you this is the same chart CNN and all the mainstream media including the government is using.  There were NOT 33636 gun deaths in the U.S. in 2013.

Rolling Stones has the most ridiculous chart there is on gun violence that is an absolute Lie! 

The FBI has the statistics on their site for 2013

  • There were an estimated 14,196 murders last year.

That is TOTAL murders for 2013!  That includes ALL forms of murder, stabbings, blunt objects, strangulation besides guns.  

Now here is another chart from this site:

Murders have been going down since the 1980s.  

Guns are not the big problem that they are made out to be.  The mainstream media and the government are lying about the statistics and those are OUTRIGHT Lies!  If people did not just believe everything they are told and researched the information themselves then they would wake up to how they are being controlled with lies.  

I am going to say this over and over again..... Guns make a person/family Safer!  Having a Gun is a way to be assured you are safe and protected!  

Look at Kennesaw Georgia where the law has been since 1982 that you MUST own and have a gun. 

That chart says it all!  Guns make a community Safer! 

You can go to the FBI site and look at all the statistics by states and the crime.  Here is a link to the 2013 crime statistics by state.    That chart is too big to put in here, so you need to go to it. 

Look at the FBI statistics of deaths by guns for each state.  I want to point out a couple of states that are on the FBI list.  

California has some of the strictest gun laws in the U.S. and yet they have the most murders there of the U.S.  1745 murders were committed in the state in 2013. with 1224 of those being committed by firearms and the rest by other means.   

I have read other articles that proclaim the states with higher gun ownership has higher murder rates by firearms.  That is completely a Lie!  The opposite is true. Criminals know that people can not protect themselves in states that don't allow guns.  The crime rate is higher in those states.  Check out all the real data I have linked from the FBI.  You can look at it in several ways.  

One of the other things that mainstream and the government fail to tell you.  More violent crimes have been stopped by concealed carry licensed civilians thinking fast and shooting a criminal before others can get hurt. 

I can put article after article here about how conceal carry civilians have saved many lives over the years.   The media and government ignore those facts and never report those stories.  They don't follow along with the narrative and falsified information about guns.  What is happening is out right lies and charts are being created to fit their stories and narratives about guns and violence.  

What is the truth is the opposite.  More gun laws create more violence.  If we had a law in the U.S. that required everyone to have a gun and one member of a family has to have a concealed weapons license.  We then would not have the shootings we have now.  A person intent on mass murder would not get far and they would know it. They would be taken out immediately!  We need guns and it is our RIGHT!  

Regarding there have been only 7 deaths from terrorism......  WOW......WHY are we spending trillions on 'The War on Terror'?   Why have we had our freedoms taken away and Why are we tracked with everything we do or say on the internet and our phones?  Why are we treated as criminals now and terrorist and called as such if we don't agree with the government?   What the 7 murders from Terrorism show is that the War On Terror is complete BULLSHIT!  

We are having our money spent and going in debt for Bullshit!  People need to wake up and look at the truth and see with their own eyes the outright lies and information that is being spoon fed to them.  The truth is out there, you simply have to find it!  I will always help when possible to bring the truth out through Real information! 

Saturday, October 3, 2015

Chris Mercer "Media saying White Supremacist" Truth is Half Black, but not one single picture of his black mom taken.

The government and media has to stay by their 'created' dialog about Chris Mercer.  In fact there must be an unsaid pact to keep that narrative going.  Why, do I say that.  There are many pictures of Chris Mercer's white father but not one picture of his mother on the internet.  Why is that?  Because she is black.

The media headlines are "White Supremacist" leanings for the reason Chris Mercer did what he did.  Are people realizing that he targeted white Christians?

I have even had a family member call me and being upset what I wrote about in my questioning and red flag post about the shooting.   

That family member started yelling at me that Chris Mercer was white and that I needed to get my facts straight and that he was a Nazi White Supremacist.  Mind you, the family member believes the 'official 9/11' story and believes in gun control and that no one should have guns.  They only listen to the mainstream media and government narratives for everything.  So, needless to say, I know they are not really seeing the truth.

Search for an image of Chris Mercer's mother, you will only find one of his father.

Do a search with her name; Laurel Harper, Chris Harper Mercer's mother, for images, again all you get is images of Chris Harper and images of his father.  Not one single image of his mother.  The media is keeping that out of the public on purpose.

Do a search for Chris Mercer White Supremacist and you will find that is the headlines for many articles about the shooter.

The official narrative is; he was a white nazi loving right leaning shooter who killed Christians.  Yet, the first reports were that he was a Black Lives Matter Supporter.  

The official narratives include him being obsessed with guns.

I want to say, the media is not being honest at all by not showing his mother in images.  Chris Mercer was close to his mother.  He lived with her.

I have a real problem with the slanted information about the shooting.  The public is not being told the whole truth.  It is having to fit into a narrative that is contrived.  Is it any wonder I question every single thing that happens?  When I see we are not being given all the information about an event and people involved and things are being hidden, I then doubt all the facts.

I will say over and over again, the only reason we even have some form of freedoms still is the fact that we have a limited 2nd amendment still.  If our right to bear arms is taken away we will immediately lose every other free right we have left, which is not many.

Will an image of Chris Mercer's mother ever be released, or will she stay hidden from the public forever, so people don't question the 'White Supremacist' narrative?

I just want people to think for themselves about everything that happens. I want people to question everything released and look at what is not being released and then ask, Why?  I want people to start understanding we are being controlled to think one way about an event or situation by the government and media.  People need to start thinking for themselves, they need to read between the lines.  Don't just believe everything they are told.  I don't want people to just believe everything I write either.  As I can get things wrong too, though not on purpose, I try to put out the truth at all times.

Friday, October 2, 2015

On CNN; "Problem with Russia in Syria. An Accidental Skirmish With The US LED ISIS Coalition"

Read what it says "U.S. Led ISIS Coalition"!

On CNN's Broadcast, Daniel Drezner from The Washington Post, said that the problem with Russia in Syria is a possible accidental skirmish with the U.S. LED ISIS Coalition!

All the media has already been mentioning how Russia is bombing their CIA "moderate" rebels of Al Qaeda.   Of course they use the word 'rebel' instead of 'terrorist'.  Which is really funny.  Because wasn't it Al Qaeda who used to be called terrorist here?  Weren't they the reason we went to Iraq and Afghanistan?  Really weird.... I wonder if people are noticing that the U.S. now fully embraces and admits arming and supporting Al Qaeda, who were suppose to be our mortal enemies who did 9/11.  Now it seems there is a slip and the U.S. is behind ISIS too. 

In other words.  The U.S. is behind all the terrorist in the Middle East.  But they have to use the excuse of the war on terror, to keep our freedoms locked down.  

Will people understand all of this?  Will they listen to what is being said and the fact the U.S. is behind all the killings and revolutions in the Middle East?  

The only reason we are in Afghanistan is so they completely control the world's heroin production.  But remember we are there "To fight Terrorism/Al Qaeda", that is the official line as the government and media stick to it.    

Here is CNN

Thursday, October 1, 2015

The Oregon Shooting at Umpqua College. Here are some immediate red flag questions

  A Chris Mercer, 26 has been identified as the shooter at the Oregon Umpqua Community College

 I have some questions about this already.  

I don't think the media will lead with the fact the Oregon shooter was a "Black Lives Matter" supporter.  He was out to kill whites and Christians.  It does not fit their profiling they want, unlike how they unearthed a picture of the church shooter with a confederate flag a couple of months ago.  

“The shooter was lining people up and asking if they were Christian,” she wrote. “If they said yes, then they were shot in the head. If they said no, or didn’t answer, they were shot in the legs.
 He wrote about killing people at a school/college on a forum the night before.   It is completely disgusting how he was urged to do killings by others on the forum.  

Now the red flags and the questions I would like everyone to think about is the following from this article from the New York Post about the shooting. 

Sometime later, students’ cell phones were confiscated and they were escorted out of their buildings with their hands up as authorities patted them down and lined them up to be evacuated on buses, according to NRToday.

Now read this from the USA article about the shooting.

Hanlin, the Douglas County sheriff overseeing the investigation, has been vocal in opposing state and federal gun-control legislation.
Hanlin registered his opposition this year as state lawmakers considered requiring background checks on private, person-to-person gun sales.
Hanlin told a legislative committee in March that a background-check mandate wouldn't prevent criminals from getting firearms.
He said the state should combat gun violence by cracking down on convicted criminals found with guns, and by addressing people with unmanaged mental health issues.
Hanlin also sent a letter to Vice President Joe Biden in 2013, after the shooting at a Newtown, Connecticut, elementary school. Hanlin said he and his deputies would refuse to enforce new gun-control restrictions "offending the constitutional rights of my citizens."

First, WHY did they confiscate all the phones from the students that were in the college during the shooting?  I have never heard of phones being confiscated except when there are pictures and videos that authorities do not want made public.

Second,  It happened in the county where the sheriff there stands by the people's constitutional rights to bear arms and refused to enforce any gun control by the federal government.  Is that just a major coincidence?

I just think those two facts are very odd.  Of course this is going to be something that is jumped on by Obama, for gun control.  He has already made a speech about it.  But I seriously doubt he brought up the Black Lives Matter connection.  Of course if it had been someone who had been pictured with a confederate flag at one time, he would bring that up.

Information is still coming in about the shooting, but those are two things that really stood out to me after reading just those two articles too about it.  I wanted to bring those two oddities to people's attention.

I want to send my thoughts and condolences to all those who have been impacted and have lost their lives from this horrible and senseless tragedy.  No one should take another person's life.  I feel for the families involved.

I am not down playing what happened, I am simply asking questions about what I read and the things that don't make sense or is strange about it.  

Update:  The New York Post has now taken out the information about the cell phones being confiscated.  But I had pasted and copied what was written before.

Saturday, September 26, 2015

It has been a long time since I have given the blog attention. What I have been doing this year.......


Well,  many of you believe I may have dropped off the face of the Earth or 'rounded up' :)

It has been a crazy year for me.

I sold my house last December and have not gotten settled since.

I have been following 'the dream' of living on a boat.  So I bought one down in Florida for a really excellent price, or so I thought.  The price was so good, I did not have it inspected.   Well...... you can imagine what that got me.

The boat is still in Florida.  Almost a year later, still being worked on and still having lots of problems.  Every month I thought, it was going to start the trip up, yet month after month goes by and yet there is another problem that has to be fixed.  It has taken a major toll on me, where it has done a real number on me, mentally, emotionally, physically and financially.  There is yet another problem now that has to be fixed before she can come up.

My intention is to name the boat 'Namaste'.   The meaning of which is from the Eastern cultures and it is: "The Divine Light in me, sees the Divine Light in you.  Together we are one in that state."  For me it is to try and see everyone in the truth of themselves and me, which we are all divine we just have to bring the inner to the outer.  We all need to have the intent to be the best we can be and to see others as who they are in truth.

So, for 2 and half years I had the intention of selling my house and everything in it to buy and live on a boat.  With that intention in mind, I had signed up for a Diesel powered technology course at the college.  There was a 2 year waiting list to get into the course.  I signed up in 2013 for it, in March they called my name up as being able to get in.  I delayed starting until May, thinking I was going to bring the boat up between March and May.... well that didn't happen.

I have been in college learning diesel engines, welding, electrical and so on, since May.  I go every day to class, except for the weekends.  Class starts at 8 am.  I am the only woman in my class and the oldest.  There are 21 of us, who have all started at different times.  Some of the guys will be graduating at the end of this year and so on every couple of months, someone leaves and new people come in.  It is a 20 month course, so I will graduate December 2016.

I am loving the course.  I have had no mechanical experience before this.  No one in my family has ever been mechanical in the least.  I had never even changed the oil in any of my cars previously.  So I have been starting from not knowing a single thing about engines.  Many of the guys (all in teens or twenties, except for one 40 ish man) have been around engines and know a lot before they get into the course.  The guys in their teens signed up for the course before they were even juniors in high school, since it is such a long wait list.

Our instructor is amazing.  He literally knows everything about engines.  He built an engine and completely re did a truck at the age of 14.  He knows everything imaginable, including every type fuel system, rail there is and he is a master mechanic besides welder and so on.  I am thrilled to have him as our instructor and learning from him.

It has been a really hard year, that has entailed so much frustration besides many other emotions.  I haven't been able to even write about it because I have been so emotional regarding it all.

It seems that almost everyone I talk to has had a very trying year.  There have been other things that have caused emotional distress too, including a sister who had kidnapped our father and hid him for his money.  He died after she had him sign everything over to her in his will.  The emotions and anger I have dealt with regarding that, there is no expressing into words.  She took so much more than money, which she will one day have to repay in really strong karma.  She took away soul forgiveness and a deep soul atonement that would have been good for all of us and now we can never get back.  She may have gotten all his money and possessions, but that is only temporary and greed vibrations.  It is the higher love and forgiveness realm she will one day have to pay back and I sure in the hell would not want to be her!  She had done this a few years ago in getting all of our grandparents money through having a will naming her as the beneficiary.   But what she did with our father, by hiding him from his family and friends........ that is completely evil in the core.  Oh, but of course she is one of those... who says I am a "Christian" in every sentence... "Pray for me".... She is one who preys on people's emotions and uses God as her facade.  She is an over the top "Christian" along with her husband and son.  She and her family will live sorry and pitiful lives due to what they do and 'God' will have his vengeance upon their heads.  Karma is a Bitch.... when you create bad Karma and you live in through lies and greed, instead of Love and doing what is right for all.

I did do one adventure this year, which I still need to write about.  I went down to the Bayou Corne sinkhole in Louisiana and investigated it.  I took a lot of pictures and talked to the local people there about what was really going on and what is happening now.   I will try and get the information up soon about the sinkhole.

So.... that is the very short of what has been happening with me and why I have not been posting.  Besides there has been so many times I have wanted to post about things, but would be too frustrated or emotional about various subjects.